Showing posts with label no copyright infringement intended. Show all posts
Showing posts with label no copyright infringement intended. Show all posts

Friday, June 28, 2013

As Predicted...

As predicted in Exploiting Pinterest's Embed Feature, semi-automated or fully automated scraper sites are re-arranging Pinterest's crowdscraped content for further redistribution but especially PROFIT.

May this serve as a reminder for those that are flattered when their material is "pinned" - when the horses run out of the barn, there is no telling how far they'll go.

To wit: craftprojectimage.com.

Every content creator's favorite byline is displayed on this scraper blog:
No copyright infringement intended. The source of each image and it's related text is always linked to with the 'source' link at the bottom of each post.
Except that the "source link" leads back to Pinterest, not to the content provider's own website.

And the below, a reminder for everyone that argues that "Pinterest makes no money!!!":
This website uses third-party advertising companies to serve ads to visitors of this site and may use information (not including visitors' name, addresses, e-mail addresses, or telephone numbers) about visits to this website to provide ads which are of interest to the visitors. It is advised to install a dependable anti-virus software and firewall on visitor's computer so as to have optimum safety from computer virus attacks.
Pinterest may make no money beyond raising venture capital by exploiting other people's content by way of crowdscraping, but there is nothing to stop fourth-party scraper sites to exploit the EMBED feature and actually profit from copyright infringement.

The "flattery" of having one's artistic material ravaged by pinners comes at the cost of being used a tool by internet pirate to draw visitors, and infect their computers.

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Pinterest Needs To Educate Its Users.


Please note that any and all images, photos, etc. have a link provided and
I will not be responsible for any copyright infringement.

This kind of comment is of the type that makes copyright owner's blood boil; it is one step beyond "no copyright infringement intended" disclaimer/admission-of-guit with its bold refusal of responsibility. As if the author of the disclaimer was the one in control, rather than the victims of her infringement (it can be called infringement, as the pinner admits not being the owner of the images and does not claim permission).

It must be remembered that this sort of ignorance is common place, if rarely this brazen, and to some extent fostered by Pinterest's recent emphasis on attribution, confirming in their user's minds that a link absolves them of infringement.

Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Not Cool, The Cool Hunter

The shutting down of The Cool Hunter's Facebook Fan Page has set bloggers' typewriters on fire. The Cool Hunter's is a website whose sphere activity is very similar to Pinterest, minus the social aspect.

the cool hunter
You can still find The Cool Hunter's web page
but you won't find its Facebook Fan Page anymore.


The Cool Hunter puts third-party images together in a lattice, and calls them cool. Their attitude is that if you find your content on The Cool Hunter, and want it removed, they will remove it - just like Pinterest and its 10 million strong no-copyright-infringement-intended army. Both claim the right to infringe to their heart's content, and send content creators on endless goose chases for their images.

Unlike Pinterest, who earns its keep through raising of venture capital, The Cool Hunter monetizes the infringed content in a more conspicuous manner by placing advertisements around it.

The Cool Hunter marketed itself, in part, through a Facebook fan page. This fan page was recently shut down amidst the consternation of its 788,000 members, for cause of REPEATED COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT. We're talking sending-a-message to a lot of people, here.

I'll give the author of APhotoEditor's blog the last word. In Facebook Shuts Down Business Fan Page For Repeated Copyright Infringement, the blogger comments:
It makes me wonder if Facebook is showing Pinterest that the proper way to curate is to upload something you own the rights to then enable the sharing.
Damn straight - Facebook is showing Pinterest how it's done.

Friday, September 7, 2012

Sue Me, Please - Yes, I'll Oblige If I Can

Why would anyone complain about copyright infringement for linking to them? The world has gone mad. Which I guess I knew already.



This taunting image has been pinned repeatedly, with the following comment: Poking the beehive. With all the talk about copyright infringements and #Pinterest, I'm still #Pinning. Sue me.

If you ever come to the point of suing pinners, these pinners, who have pinned or repinned this "sue me" taunt, should be on everyone's remorse-free priority lawsuit list:
PIN URLPinner
http://pinterest.com/pin/16958936066750546/ Noland Hoshino (2764 pins)
http://pinterest.com/pin/186055028325717760/ Beth Kanter (932 pins)
http://pinterest.com/pin/5699936999464640/ Angela Dixon Cook
http://pinterest.com/pin/3377768440549567/ Cincy Wexler
http://pinterest.com/pin/144467100517692823/ Leah Albanese (2336 pins)
http://pinterest.com/pin/179792210094658852/ Julia Lentz (1144 pins)
http://pinterest.com/pin/163677767677225360/ Ifdy Perez
http://pinterest.com/pin/27092035228402851/ Julie Lubinsky
http://pinterest.com/pin/135671007494724807/ Bobby Nicolescu (2100 pins)
http://pinterest.com/pin/94083079685678084/ Claire Wagner
http://pinterest.com/pin/203154633160893271/ Non-Profit Organizations
http://pinterest.com/pin/87820261453835136/ JM Villero
http://pinterest.com/pin/144185625540025017/ Pontus Westerberg
http://pinterest.com/pin/183662491023650854/ Megan Southall
http://pinterest.com/pin/100134791684887060/ Kathy Catino (22,479 pins)
http://pinterest.com/pin/44824958761611519/ Marcin Wec (859 pins)
http://pinterest.com/pin/227854062367374982/ Keren Lerner (2336 pins)
http://pinterest.com/pin/224757837623553715/ Gabrielle Laine-Peters (925 pins)
http://pinterest.com/pin/268104984036830352/ Faith Ruggiero (5207 pins)
http://pinterest.com/pin/80994493268595475/ Jack Varnell (2649 pins)
http://pinterest.com/pin/4925880812399578/ Christy Aleckson


Some want to infringe and asking nicely not to be sued.

Here I credited the source, don't sue me.
henrybuilt, uncrate, don't sue me for copyright infringement.


I'm confusing crediting the source with infringement.
I'm just like you, a novel. Complicated, hidden long story that shed tears and cheers itself.❞ ---Yousef Al-Shereida / To avoid copyright infringement, I don't take credit for my displayed images

Saturday, September 1, 2012

Unrequited Love At Loveit.com



Pinterest is little more than a dumb platform based on crowdsourcing the scraping of visual content without having to pay anyone a cent, except perhaps a handful of lightweight programmers and high-power attorneys; it was simply a matter of time for other crowdsourcing content scraping thieves to start to elbow it for a piece of the action. Pinterest, for a time, was ahead of the game by providing a central display of third-party image content, which was until then scattered on the creators' websites. With many viable competitors now entering the arena, the visual content is now trending back to its original scattered state, only on image scrapers rather than the creators' own websites. Yes, this is ironic.

Launched in mid-May 2012, Loveit.com is such a viable competitor. It outshines Pinterest in terms of sheer arrogance.

Mashable quoted LoveIt’s CEO Ron Lapierre:
We clearly call out in our Terms of Service that the content you bring into LoveIt is yours…We don’t claim any ownership of the content and you’re more than welcome to move it or share it on any other site you choose.
Yeah, right. Just like Pinterest, they have a one-click infringement pinmarklet-like tool which is called +Loveit - blowing any pretense that Loveit isn't just yet another copyright infringement platform right out of the water. It's just a variation of the no copyright infringement intended disclaimer.
  • Loveit.com shows large "thumbnails" at 220 pixels wide.
  • For now, unlike Pinterest, Loveit's links to your website are normal links, and not rendered worthless by the addition of the "nofollow" attribute. This may be a temporary lure, until they can legitimately use spam prevention as an excuse to use the "nofollow."
  • Loveit.com's domain name is cloaked by a privacy service. One cannot investigate ownership of the website by normal means.
  • With Loveit.com, you can select all images on a given page - copyright infringement on steroids!
  • Image uploads from search engine result pages are welcome as always.
  • With Loveit.com, you can upload multiple files from your hard drive.
  • Like Pinterest, Loveit has an EMBED code generator to propagate the infringement to fourth-party websites.
  • Loveit.com has private/group settings making the infringement more difficult to detect.
  • That's not all! There's a PIN IT button on every image uploaded to Loveit.com!!! The copyright equivalent of the multiplication of loaves and fish.
  • Guess what? Like Pinterest, it's hosted on Amazon's servers! Indeed, their abuse contact email is at: ec2-abuse@amazon.com.
  • Loveit.com, perhaps wishing to make a user's transition from crowdsourcing for the ultimate benefit of Ben Silbermann and his venture capitalists, to its own benefit, "a frictionless experience" has a tool to faciliate mass transfer of images from Pinterest to itself.
  • Like Pinterest, Loveit features "/source/" subfolders where the aggregated content from a single website is displayed. There is a large one for Pinterest: http://loveit.com/source/pinterest.com. Like Pinterest, further pages of aggregated content can be acessed at http://loveit.com/source/pinterest.com?page=2 and changing the page number in the URL. Of course, the reciprocate page of loveit.com content aggregated at Pinterest can be found at http://pinterest.com/source/loveit.com

Learning from Pinterest's errors, Loveit comes right out of the gate with an opt-out code.

As was predicted; now, every Pinterest clone is going to have a proprietary blocking code, forcing everyone to recode their websites, and creating a culture of "free-to-steal" as the default state. And look at the pulling of heartstrings: this blocking code is called "nolove." <meta name="LoveIt" content="nolove">. Right. Thanks, but no thanks. No one should have to do this for what is bound to become hundreds of websites.

The recoding-for-every-new-copyright-infringement-platform insanity does not stop here. You can block individual images with yet another propriety attribute to insert in the img src code: nolove="nolove" - again, aw shucks, don't you want love? No? You want no love? No love for this poor unloved image.

There is a way out of this madness with your .htaccess file. Image substitution is more complicated than with Pinterest, because Loveit.com sneakily fails to identify itself in the user-agent field. Instead, you have to deny access to all of Amazon's cloud server IP ranges. There is no downside to this, there is no legitimate traffic to be received from an Amazon cloud server.

Add the following at the top of your .htacess file:
ErrorDocument 403 http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8445/7895057430_928a6c1171_b.jpg
Add this last in your .htaccess file:
Allow from all
order allow,deny
allow from all

Deny from 8.18.144.0/23
Deny from 23.20.0.0/14
Deny from 46.51.128.0/17
Deny from 46.137.0.0/16
Deny from 50.16.0.0/14
Deny from 50.112.0.0/16
Deny from 54.240.0.0/12
Deny from 67.202.0.0/18
Deny from 72.44.32.0/19
Deny from 75.101.128.0/17
Deny from 79.125.0.0/17
Deny from 96.127.0.0/17
Deny from 103.4.8.0/21
Deny from 107.20.0.0/14
Deny from 122.248.192.0/18
Deny from 174.129.0.0/16
Deny from 175.41.128.0/17
Deny from 176.32.64.0/18
Deny from 176.34.0.0/16
Deny from 177.71.128.0/17
Deny from 184.72.0.0/15
Deny from 184.169.128.0/17
Deny from 204.236.128.0/17
Deny from 216.182.224.0/20
This will substitute any unwanted love for this image:

Sunday, August 26, 2012

The Disclaimer Making The Repin Rounds

The disclaimer below has been making the rounds; it's being repinned on a great number of boards. It is misguided and wrong on so many levels; it embodies the ignorance of copyright laws among Pinterest users.
NOTICE

This notice is to inform any and all Pinterest users I lay no claim as originator of any content included herein. The images here are not my creative product, nor do I intend to sell or profit from the creative and intellectual property of another. My sole goal is to appreciate, advance and promote awareness of content pinned herein.
>>> Original Pin

copyright disclaimer pinterest>
<div style='clear: both;'></div>
</div>
<div class='post-footer'>
<div class='post-footer-line post-footer-line-1'><span class='post-author vcard'>
Posted by
<span class='fn'>
<a href='https://www.blogger.com/profile/04547449968402945578' itemprop='author' rel='author' title='author profile'>
A Glass Artist
</a>
</span>
</span>
<span class='post-timestamp'>
at
<a class='timestamp-link' href='http://pinterest-out.blogspot.com/2012/08/the-disclaimer-making-repin-rounds.html' itemprop='url' rel='bookmark' title='permanent link'><abbr class='published' itemprop='datePublished' title='2012-08-26T20:15:00-04:00'>8:15 PM</abbr></a>
</span>
<span class='post-comment-link'>
<a class='comment-link' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment/fullpage/post/4995107919527402869/3844177022733718552' onclick=''>0
comments</a>
</span>
<span class='post-icons'>
<span class='item-control blog-admin pid-411363520'>
<a href='https://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=4995107919527402869&postID=3844177022733718552&from=pencil' title='Edit Post'>
<img alt='' class='icon-action' height='18' src='https://resources.blogblog.com/img/icon18_edit_allbkg.gif' width='18'/>
</a>
</span>
</span>
<div class='post-share-buttons goog-inline-block'>
<a class='goog-inline-block share-button sb-email' href='https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogID=4995107919527402869&postID=3844177022733718552&target=email' target='_blank' title='Email This'><span class='share-button-link-text'>Email This</span></a><a class='goog-inline-block share-button sb-blog' href='https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogID=4995107919527402869&postID=3844177022733718552&target=blog' onclick='window.open(this.href,

Saturday, August 18, 2012

Good Pinning Etiquette Is Pinning Your Own Stuff Only

Read up on the PhotoAttorney.com website!
  • I didn’t make any money from the infringement.
  • I didn’t know it was copyrighted.
  • If it’s on the web, then it’s public domain unless clearly marked otherwise.
  • I gave credit to the photographer.
  • I took it down when asked.
None of the above will help a pinner in court.

Especially if the pin board is decorated with the "disclaimer" no-copyright-infringement-intended-none-of-the-pictures-are-mine.

Tuesday, August 14, 2012

Catch Me If You Can

It's not only Zoe Parks; many pinners choose to boldly acknowledge their copyright infringing ways, entreating content creators to contact them if they want their images removed.

This catch-me-if-you-can attitude to copyright is quite burdensome for content creators. The infringers post images with uncontrolled hubris, surrendering broad rights to the corporate entity that is Pinterest, and their creators are supposed to monitor these millions of pins for infringement, and of course ask nicely that the images be removed.

The disclaimers are ineffective, other than you help potential litigious artists to spot willful infringement. Someone that admits to infringement cannot claim, in a court, that they didn't know. Yet, like voodoo, these magical words are assumed to protect one against the legal evil eye.

Nan Johnson


Ana Martins


Therese Galilei Rousch
This pinner uses the magic catch-me-if-you-can disclaimer at least 3 times, she must believe in its effectiveness.
...and a one!

...and a two!

In artsy-fartsy side of me... one wonders who's side it is, Mrs. Rousch's, or that of other people?

Friday, July 27, 2012

Zoe Parks On Pinterest

Zoe Parks, a North Charleston resident with nearly 1500 pins, has posted an amusing disclaimer on the header of her Pinterest account. It embodies in three little sentences everything that is wrong with Pinterest.


None of the pictures are mine. No copyright infringement intended.
If you would like to be acknowledged or
have the picture removed, please let me know.


This is like stealing a bicycle from the streets, and writing a sign on it:
I acknowledge that this isn't my bicycle. If you catch me with it, and you want me to write your name on it, or return it to you, let me know!
No consequence for our bicycle thief while the rightful owner has to search every street in the city, call the police, and put "lost bicycle" signs on telephone poles.

Saturday, June 16, 2012

Convincing Pinners Might Be An Uphill Battle


Pinterest is a pain to many creators.
Pinterest doesn't "get it." Will the public?


Meet The Real Linda Ellis is a disturbing read where a self-described innocent infringer berates a copyright holder for attempting to enforce statutory damages to the tune of $7500.00.

Linda Ellis wrote a rather simplistic poem entitled "The Dash" that some years ago has made the FWD: FWD: FWD: email rounds that grannies love to send each other. The poem is about the dash between the birth and death years on a tombstone, metaphorically speaking, the "living" between the two dates. Linda Ellis claims to have registered this work, and it has become her bread an butter, going as far as expanding the little ditty into a book about not wasting time.

When the poem was found, posted in its entirety, on April Brown's website, Linda Ellis sent her a demand for $7500 for the use of her poem.

What resulted is a very long exchange that, regardless of the merits of the poem, demonstrates the entrenched disregard and the deep lack of understanding of copyright law found in some segments of the general public.

While it's easy to sympathize with Brown's shock, anger and frustration at having to pay an amount many, many times greater than the value of her use of the poem, her misadventure illustrates the pitfalls of using a copyright-infringement platform like Pinterest.

Like a minefield, most of the steps you will take won't blow your leg off, but eventually, you, or someone in your village will be the unlucky one to pay the price.

If the Brown/Ellis conflict is any indication, creators attempting to defend their copyright against pinners (because Pinterest itself rejects all blame in their ToS) will be labelled copyright trolls, and the infringers, innocent infringers.

Ben Silbermann may wax poetic about making Pinterest "beautiful" but Pinterest is a hideous reality to the many creators whose contents its users grab, for it to commercially exploit some time in the near future, as the hiring of Tim Kendall suggests. If creators don't defend their copyright, they lose; if they defend it, they lose, too - legal fees and public opinion.

Thanks, Ben.

Tuesday, May 29, 2012

It's Not About Prints!


Many Pinterest enthusiasts are convinced that their activity isn't cutting into the artists' lucrative print business, therefore no artist is losing revenue from the copyright infringement.


Dearest Pinterest enthusiasts,

Hardly any of us making a living from our art or craft has ever made a penny from framable prints. Only a few photographers do, most do not.

Prints isn't how we put food on our tables. We understand that it's difficult for you to grasp the multitude of ways we squeeze boxes of Kraft Dinner and Ramen noodles from our work. It's a hussle, we have to be creative in art, and in business.

Copyright infringement hurts us.

Enjoy pinning your own work, pictures with a "PIN IT" button, and images from Creative Commons.

Love,
The Artists.

Monday, May 7, 2012

"No Copyright Infringement Intended"


I do not own any portion of any photos pinned or described, it belongs to its rightful owners. No copyright infringement intended.


Googling site:pinterest.com "no copyright infringement intended" yields 530,000 results. This means that more than half a million "pinners" believe that this disclaimer protects them from claims of copyright infringement, as the infringement was not intended.

Not to compare copyright infringement with violent crimes, but this is like going into a bank with a gun and a nylon stocking over one's head, demanding money from the cashier, and shouting: "I don't intend to rob this bank! I don't mean to steal this money!"

Looking at the context of this bizarre disclaimer, one can see that it underlies a complete lack of understanding of what copyright infringement is. Some write: "posted for inspiration only; no copyright infringement intended" as if a claiming a non-commercial purpose makes infringement more tolerable.

Some will even boldly acknowledge that they are infringing, followed by the disclaimer "I do not own any portion of any photos pinned or described, it belongs to its rightful owners. No copyright infringement intended." They KNOW that they are infringing copyrights, and they're worried about it enough to draw attention to it - but they want us to believe it was unintentional, and that makes it OK.