Google has made a serious mistake, they are looking at class action lawsuits being filed against their company. As a photographer and copyright holder I’d be happy to join any and all of those class action law suits against Google. The way I see it Google is crapping on our rights as artists, creators and photographers. And I am furious about it.SIGN PETITION HERE
Showing posts with label image search. Show all posts
Showing posts with label image search. Show all posts
Tuesday, February 5, 2013
More On Google Images
Google has become the biggest image scraper of the Millennium is one of the best commentaries on the new Image search, do not miss it!
Monday, January 28, 2013
Discussions About Image Searches
A discussion about the new Google Images rollout can be found here:
Google Images' New (Bing-like) Layout
A discussion about the Bing Images can be found here:
Bing is stealing our server's bandwidth
Bing Images offers rogue webmasters an API whereby they can leech off Bing, for example, picstopin and other similar dodgy image websites.
Google Images' New (Bing-like) Layout
A discussion about the Bing Images can be found here:
Bing is stealing our server's bandwidth
Bing Images offers rogue webmasters an API whereby they can leech off Bing, for example, picstopin and other similar dodgy image websites.
Sunday, January 27, 2013
Some Terrible, Terrible News.
You heard it here first. Pinterest's greatest "contribution" to the internet is to set off a tsunami of image theft from every direction, inspiring countless websites to join the fray of image vampires.
Google has now rolled out a new Image Search - as if the search engine giant was trying to "undercut" Pinterest in the highly popular image-theft business.
Try it yourself: got to Google Images, launch a search query, and click on any image.
You'll see that Google now displays a large version of that image WITHIN GOOGLE IMAGE SEARCH. That's right; Google has no longer confines itself to the use of thumbnails. Why not, since the copyright-infringement trailblazer Pinterest remains to this day free of serious legal challenges?
Adding insult to injury, Google has neglected to provide an opt out mechanism for webmasters to block the display of large images.
And here we are again, in some bizarre situation where we have to take action if we want our copyright to be respected.
Google, if it chose to do so, would have the ability to give webmasters a disadvantage in search engine results should they decide to opt out of image theft. This is quite a sinister development.
For more: Plagiarism Today.
Google has now rolled out a new Image Search - as if the search engine giant was trying to "undercut" Pinterest in the highly popular image-theft business.
Try it yourself: got to Google Images, launch a search query, and click on any image.
You'll see that Google now displays a large version of that image WITHIN GOOGLE IMAGE SEARCH. That's right; Google has no longer confines itself to the use of thumbnails. Why not, since the copyright-infringement trailblazer Pinterest remains to this day free of serious legal challenges?
Adding insult to injury, Google has neglected to provide an opt out mechanism for webmasters to block the display of large images.
And here we are again, in some bizarre situation where we have to take action if we want our copyright to be respected.
Google, if it chose to do so, would have the ability to give webmasters a disadvantage in search engine results should they decide to opt out of image theft. This is quite a sinister development.
For more: Plagiarism Today.
The issues of Google hotlinking larger images or encouraging others to misuse images aren’t going to subside.
Monday, October 29, 2012
Google Pinterizes Its Image Search
Google Images' thumbnails are now much larger
at a set 180 pixels in height,
as shown in this unscaled screenshot.
I did a Google image search just yesterday. This morning, when I did it again, the array of images jumped at me. They were much, much larger.
They are measured at 180 pixels in height, and the even larger image that hovers over the thumbnail is now a relatively insignificant ~10% larger than the thumbnail itself. After you click to reach the actual website, there is a further intervening image that is near full-size (this is not new). Pin hags now have a choice of 2 large thumbnails hosted on Google, and a third, near full-size image that is hovering over the real one, but hosted by the content creator's website.
Pinterest's unique combination of wanton disregard for the creators whose images its users are feverishly scraping, and unfortunate success, has started a veritable conflagration of imitation that is changing the internet as we know it. And not in a good way. Where once citizen-publishers could turn a profit displaying their own images, there will be nothing but ashes left.
The latest Pinterest imitator is a heartbreaker. Google. It's a heartbreaker because Google is so large. It's not difficult to foresee a competition between search engines for who can display the biggest thumbnails without getting its wrists slapped by the law. Right now, competitor Bing's thumbnails are 75% smaller or less than Google's new supersized thumbnails. But for how long?
Bing Image search thumbnails haven't yet been pinterized.
How the other hand, it's easy to guess what Google might be thinking. Why not render Pinterest image collections even more pointless than they are now, by "improving" Google Image search? The downside is that the unashamed pinning from Google Images (which over-rides a site's nopin metatag, to add insult to injury) will be more rewarding to the pin hags, and that visitors can now spend more time on Google Images and have another reason to avoid visiting the creator's websites.
Pinterest forcing content creators to compete against their own websites was one thing. Now, Google is doing much of the same.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)